Skip to content

Individual Action

Garcia v. Character Technologies

SettledNot a class action

Megan Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwardana, Google LLC, and Alphabet Inc.

Where it stands

On May 21, 2025, Judge Anne C. Conway granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion to dismiss, allowing the strict product liability, negligence, wrongful death and Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act claims to proceed. The court declined at the pleading stage to hold that Character.AI's chatbot output is protected speech under the First Amendment, while permitting the company to assert its users' First Amendment interests. In early January 2026 the parties reported a settlement in principle and the court dismissed the case, with a period allowed to finalize terms or reopen for good cause. Terms were not disclosed.

Key ruling

May 21, 2025 order on motion to dismiss (M.D. Fla., Conway, J.): the court was 'not prepared to hold that Character A.I.'s output is speech' entitled to First Amendment protection at this stage, and allowed product liability and negligence theories to proceed against an AI chatbot for the first time.

Note on this record

Settlement terms are confidential; the dismissal is subject to finalization and the case could theoretically be reopened for good cause. Filing date is reported variously as October 22 or 23, 2024.

The record

Court
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando Division)
Case number
6:24-cv-01903
Filed
2024-10-23
Defendants
Character Technologies, Inc. (Character.AI) · Noam Shazeer · Daniel De Freitas Adiwardana · Google LLC · Alphabet Inc.
Plaintiffs
Mother suing individually and as personal representative of the estate of her 14-year-old son
Technology at issue
Character.AI
Relief sought
Compensatory and punitive damages, disgorgement of unjust enrichment, and injunctive relief requiring product design changes and deletion of models allegedly trained on minors' data
Counsel of record
Social Media Victims Law Center · Tech Justice Law Project · Center for Humane Technology (technical consultant)

Claims pleaded

Sources (4)

This page describes a publicly filed case. This site is not counsel on this matter, nothing here is legal advice, and the allegations described are allegations unless a court has said otherwise.

Back to the docketClaim encyclopedia