Skip to content

Class Action

Skyworks AI Supercycle Securities Litigation

DiscoveryClass claims present

Cesar Nunez v. Skyworks Solutions, Inc., et al.

Where it stands

Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension & Relief Fund appointed lead plaintiff May 16, 2025. On May 6, 2026, Judge David O. Carter denied the motion to dismiss in its entirety, sustaining §10(b), Rule 10b-5 and §20(a) claims. A motion for reconsideration was subsequently denied.

Key ruling

May 6, 2026 (Carter, J.): motion to dismiss denied in full. Court found it implausible that senior executives lacked knowledge of Apple's March 2023 decision to reduce reliance on Skyworks content when rank-and-file employees had it, and credited 'particularized facts supporting deliberate recklessness' plus suspicious executive departures as supporting scienter.

Note on this record

Two class-period formulations appear in the sources (the D&O Diary reports July 30, 2024 – February 5, 2025 for the initial complaint; BLB&G reports August 8, 2023 – February 5, 2025). The 'AI washing' characterization is commentators'; the operative claim is that defendants oversold Skyworks' ability to capitalize on the AI smartphone cycle and its Apple relationship.

The record

Court
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Case number
8:25-cv-00411-DOC-JDE
Filed
2025-03-04
Defendants
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. · Liam K. Griffin · Kris Sennesael
Plaintiffs
Purchasers of Skyworks Solutions common stock during the class period (alleged as August 8, 2023 – February 5, 2025 in the operative complaint; the initial complaint alleged July 30, 2024 – February 5, 2025)
Technology at issue
Skyworks RF front-end semiconductors marketed as positioned for the AI-driven smartphone upgrade cycle (Apple iPhone 16/17)
Relief sought
Class damages under Exchange Act §§ 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5
Counsel of record
Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP

Claims pleaded

Sources (3)

This page describes a publicly filed case. This site is not counsel on this matter, nothing here is legal advice, and the allegations described are allegations unless a court has said otherwise.

Back to the docketClaim encyclopedia