Skip to content

Class Action

Veiga v. Respondus

SettledClass claims present

Veiga, et al. v. Respondus, Inc.

Where it stands

$6.25 million settlement; final approval hearing held August 31, 2023 before Judge Timothy J. McJoynt. Estimated payment of roughly $50 per claimant. Respondus denied collecting biometric data.

What is not confirmed

DuPage County case number, filing date and class counsel not verified. Related but separate AI-proctoring BIPA actions include Patterson v. Respondus, Inc., 593 F. Supp. 3d 783 (N.D. Ill. 2022) and Duerr v. Bradley University, No. 1:21-cv-01096 (C.D. Ill.).

The record

Court
Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois
Case number
Docket number not established
Filed
Filing date not established
Defendants
Respondus, Inc.
Plaintiffs
Individuals who took an exam using Respondus Monitor while physically present in Illinois between November 11, 2015 and June 2, 2023
Technology at issue
Respondus Monitor AI remote exam proctoring — webcam-based facial detection and behavior monitoring of students during online exams
Relief sought
BIPA statutory damages of $1,000 per negligent violation and $5,000 per reckless or intentional violation (740 ILCS 14/20) for capturing students' facial geometry and voice data without written notice or consent.
Settlement
$6,250,000

Claims pleaded

Sources (2)

This page describes a publicly filed case. This site is not counsel on this matter, nothing here is legal advice, and the allegations described are allegations unless a court has said otherwise.

Back to the docketClaim encyclopedia