Skip to content

Individual Action

FTC v. Evolv (Deceptive AI Security Claims)

SettledNot a class action

In the Matter of Evolv Technologies, Inc.

Where it stands

The FTC announced a proposed consent order on November 26, 2024 resolving charges that Evolv falsely claimed its AI-powered Express scanners detect 'all weapons' while ignoring harmless items, and made unsupported claims about accuracy, throughput, false-alarm rates, and a 70% labor-cost reduction. The order lets schools that signed contracts between April 1, 2022 and June 30, 2023 cancel them, and bars Evolv from unsubstantiated claims about 'algorithms, artificial intelligence, or other automated systems.'

Key ruling

Consent order barring misrepresentation of detection capability, accuracy, speed, labor savings, and testing results. Bureau of Consumer Protection Director Samuel Levine: 'Claims about technology – including artificial intelligence – need to be backed up, and that is especially important when these claims involve the safety of children.'

Note on this record

Regulatory action, not a class action. It is the direct regulatory counterpart to the private securities class action In re Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation (settled for $15 million). The FTC press release does not state a matter/file number; over 800 schools in 40 states had deployed the scanners.

The record

Court
Federal Trade Commission (administrative), with related filing in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Case number
Docket number not established
Filed
2024-11-26
Defendants
Evolv Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff class not established
Technology at issue
Evolv Express AI-powered weapons-detection screening systems
Relief sought
Injunctive relief, contract-cancellation rights for affected schools, and prohibitions on unsubstantiated AI performance claims

Claims pleaded

Sources (2)

This page describes a publicly filed case. This site is not counsel on this matter, nothing here is legal advice, and the allegations described are allegations unless a court has said otherwise.

Back to the docketClaim encyclopedia