Skip to content

Class Action

In re BetterHelp

ActiveClass claims present

In re BetterHelp, Inc. Data Disclosure Cases

Where it stands

Consolidated before Chief Judge Richard Seeborg. An earlier round of privacy claims was dismissed with leave to amend. On August 21, 2025 the court denied BetterHelp's motion to require plaintiffs to litigate under their true names, holding that pseudonymous litigation was appropriate because forcing disclosure would inflict the very privacy harm alleged. The case follows BetterHelp's separate $7.8 million FTC consent order.

Key ruling

August 21, 2025 order (Seeborg, C.J.) permitting plaintiffs to proceed pseudonymously in a health-privacy class action, reasoning that requiring true names would discourage future privacy litigation.

What is not confirmed

Lead class counsel for the consolidated action was not verifiable from the sources reviewed; Milberg filed one of the constituent complaints (C.M. v. BetterHelp). The $7.8 million figure widely circulated online is the FTC settlement, not a class settlement — no class settlement has been confirmed.

The record

Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Case number
3:23-cv-01033-RS
Filed
2023-03-07
Defendants
BetterHelp, Inc.
Plaintiffs
Users of the BetterHelp online therapy platform whose intake questionnaire responses, email addresses and mental-health-related data were disclosed to Facebook, Snapchat, Pinterest and Criteo through advertising pixels and SDKs.
Technology at issue
Meta Pixel, Snap, Pinterest and Criteo advertising tags on BetterHelp intake flow
Relief sought
Damages, restitution and injunctive relief; California wiretap claims carry $5,000-per-violation statutory damages.

Claims pleaded

Sources (3)

This page describes a publicly filed case. This site is not counsel on this matter, nothing here is legal advice, and the allegations described are allegations unless a court has said otherwise.

Back to the docketClaim encyclopedia