Skip to content

Class Action

In re Clearview AI

Re-checked against the docket 2026-08-23

On AppealClass claims present

In re Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation

Where it stands

Eleven actions were consolidated as MDL 2967 before Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman (N.D. Ill., No. 1:21-cv-00135). Because Clearview could not fund a cash settlement, the class took a 23% equity-like stake in the company, valued at roughly $51.75 million; final approval was entered March 20, 2025 over objections from 23 state attorneys general. On July 13, 2026 the Seventh Circuit VACATED that approval and remanded (No. 25-1673) over inadequate class-representative substitution. The mandate issued August 4, 2026. The settlement must be renegotiated and the case is reopened.

Key ruling

July 13, 2026 (7th Cir. No. 25-1673): final approval of the equity-based BIPA settlement vacated and remanded; mandate issued August 4, 2026.

Note on this record

Widely reported as a completed settlement. It is not. Approval was vacated on July 13, 2026 and the parties are back before the district court.

The record

Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division)
Case number
1:21-cv-00135
Filed
Filing date not established
Defendants
Clearview AI, Inc. · Hoan Ton-That · Richard Schwartz · Rocky Mountain Data Analytics LLC
Plaintiffs
Nationwide class of individuals whose facial images were scraped into Clearview's database between July 1, 2017 and the preliminary approval date, with Illinois, California, New York and Virginia subclasses
Technology at issue
Clearview AI facial recognition search engine built on approximately 50 billion images scraped from the public internet
Relief sought
BIPA statutory damages of $1,000 per negligent violation and $5,000 per reckless or intentional violation (740 ILCS 14/20), injunctive relief, and disgorgement. Because Clearview could not fund a conventional cash settlement, the class took an equity position instead.
Settlement
Vacated on appeal. The vacated deal was a 23% equity-like stake, estimated at approximately $51.75 million.
Counsel of record
Loevy & Loevy

Claims pleaded

Sources (4)

This page describes a publicly filed case. This site is not counsel on this matter, nothing here is legal advice, and the allegations described are allegations unless a court has said otherwise.

Back to the docketClaim encyclopedia